Virtuoso - (Scripting 2nd offense)

[Peyton]

@Virtuoso: Again, the posting on the website and self-admittance of hack-use is sufficient for a ban. The demo shows several jumps not flashing, therefore it is a ban.

@dop: You still don't understand what I'm saying. He admitted to using hacks so giving him the benefit of the doubt is foolish. The absence of flash in the demo is the result of the hack. Had he not admitted to using a hack then this situation would be entirely different and he would have the benefit of the doubt and there would need to be more proof for a ban. However, he admitted to using a script and the demo happened to reflect that.

I would not be doing my job if I was to discover that a player was using hacks and then not banning them when the demo corresponded to the use of hacks.

While, I try to answer all your questions, you simply ignore mine. Why do you spend time specing AFM players in bhop servers if you don't think a player should be banned if the use of hacks does not occur in AFM servers?