hyoujin
Retired
Posts: 60
Joined: Jan 2013
|
i'm not upset but you have been flaming it for the past week.
the win/loss wouldn't really make players "try" more in pugs as more often than not the game lies in the hands of the quarterback..
i think the lack of players contributing on the field is a result of poor quarterback play, players unwilling to deal with a "new" quarterback, and blow out games which all kind of relate.
i think the compare idea is good.. i think to take that even further you should be able to break down how many plays a player has as a receiver/db, as a rusher, as a qb, etc. and be able to track down who the most efficient rusher, qb, etc. at each position (might be difficult)
currently the number of plays is a total of everything and therefore the # of plays per TD/INT would be skewed depending on if you QB or not (if you qb the # of plays still tally on while your TD/INT [unless you're covering] as a receiver would remain at 0)
|
|
2-4-13 5:37 PM |
|