|
Tie breaker system CSFL II. Questionable?
|
Author |
Message |
kc21
99
Posts: 588
Joined: Jan 2013
|
According to the current tie breaker, points against is being used to determine which team gets the higher seed with a higher record. This means that how many points a team gives up, can determine your seeding. I am not in favor of this rule because we are eliminating the points for category which can determine the amount of points given up in a game. If an offense tends to look forward to attacking deep and not having long possessions with the ball in their hands, this means that they will score more and most likely give up more then other teams. Based on the pace of the game, whoever has a slower offense will generally have a better defense in the end of the game. The point differential makes more sense because it involves both offense and defense. For example, Team Toronto had the highest margin of victory in week 1, +34. Compared to the current #1 seed in this system, Chicago, they have a +7 point differential. Based on that alone and not basing off team schedule difficulty, Team Toronto was easily the most dominant team in week 1.
Show +1, or -1 if you are for or against this tie breaking system
Bibliography sources: Arod
|
|
8-7-13 6:02 PM |
|
Messages In This Thread |
Tie breaker system CSFL II. Questionable? - kc21 - 8-7-13 6:02 PM
[] - Gee - 8-7-13, 6:30 PM
|
|